On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 06:13:59PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Stuart, we're getting into ePAPR territory. Do you think we need to worry > about a hypervisor not handling mtmsr(MSR_WE)? In that case, we'd need to be > more specific than just testing for "/hypervisor". IMHO every hypervisor > should implement it... but maybe /hypervisor/idle = "wait" would be more > explicit and therefore better?
We can't trap on MSR[WE] updates on hypervisor-enabled chips; the write is silently ignored. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
