On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:55:05PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 28.04.19 17:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 02:52:17PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult > > wrote:
> >> - int ret = 0; > > > > This and Co is a separate change that can be done in its own patch. > > I don't really understand :( > Do you mean the splitting off the retval part from the rest ? You do two things here: one of them is removing ret and other relative changes. This should be split to a separate patch. > > You may increase readability by introducing temporary variables > > > > ... mapbase = port->mapbase; > > ... mapsize = port->mapsize; > > ... > > port->membase = ioremap_nocache(mapbase, mapsize); > > ... > > Is that really necessary ? Maybe it's just my personal taste, but I > don't feel the more more verbose one is really easier to read. Up to Greg. For me it's harder to read all those port-> in several parameters. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
