On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 03:41:01PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote: >> + pasemi_mac_tx_intr(mac->tx->chan.irq, mac->tx); >> + enable_irq(mac->tx->chan.irq); >> + >> + disable_irq(mac->rx->chan.irq); >> + pasemi_mac_rx_intr(mac->rx->chan.irq, dev); > > Shouldn't this actually be pasemi_mac_rx_intr(mac->rx->chan.irq, mac->rx)?
Yeah, it should. It used to take the netdev pointer instead. And the void * argument means I never got a compiler warning from it. Thanks! -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
