On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > I'm working on a patch. I'm not sure how to handle the early udbg printk > problem, so the first version will just ignore it.
udbg printk is extremely useful... I'd not be fond of it breaking. Perhaps we should stick more initialization into the cpm udbg code, so it isn't so dependent on the bootloader setup... though we'd have push the CPM reset and SMC allocation earlier in such a case. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
