On 09/20/2018 10:22 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > ------------------------- > | L1 Cache | > ---------------------------------- > |L2| | | | | > | | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |Small Core0 > |C | | | | | > Big |a -------------------------- > Core |c | | | | | > |h | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | Small Core1 > |e | | | | | > ----------------------------- > | L1 Cache | > --------------------------
The scheduler already knows about shared caches. Could you elaborate on how this is different from the situation today where we have multiple cores sharing an L2/L3? Adding the new sysfs stuff seems like overkill if that's all that you are trying to do.
