Le 29/08/2018 à 15:13, David Gounaris a écrit :
There is a need to allow higher indexes to be
able to support MPC83xx platforms. (UCC1-UCC8)
Signed-off-by: David Gounaris <david.gouna...@infinera.com>
---
drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
index 33df76405b86..5cf6dcba039c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static int ucc_hdlc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
ucc_num = val - 1;
- if ((ucc_num > 3) || (ucc_num < 0)) {
+ if ((ucc_num > UCC_MAX_NUM - 1) || (ucc_num < 0)) {
CHECK:UNNECESSARY_PARENTHESES: Unnecessary parentheses around 'ucc_num < 0'
#23: FILE: drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c:1018:
+ if ((ucc_num > UCC_MAX_NUM - 1) || (ucc_num < 0)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, ": Invalid UCC num\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel
antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
