On 04/24/2018 12:01 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int pseries_update_ala_memory_aai(int aa_index,
>> + struct property *dmprop)
>> +
>> +static int pseries_update_ala_memory(struct of_reconfig_data *pr)
> The two routines above should be updated to use the in-kernel drmem array
> instead
> of looking up the dynamic-memory property in the device tree.
Okay.
>
> -Nathan
Thanks.
Michael
>
>> +
>> static int pseries_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> unsigned long action, void *data)
>> {
>> @@ -1067,6 +1184,9 @@ static int pseries_memory_notifier(struct
>> notifier_block *nb,
>> case OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY:
>> if (!strcmp(rd->prop->name, "ibm,dynamic-memory"))
>> err = pseries_update_drconf_memory(rd);
>> + if (!strcmp(rd->prop->name,
>> + "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays"))
>> + err = pseries_update_ala_memory(rd);
>> break;
>> }
>> return notifier_from_errno(err);
>>
>
--
Michael W. Bringmann
Linux Technology Center
IBM Corporation
Tie-Line 363-5196
External: (512) 286-5196
Cell: (512) 466-0650
m...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
