Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> writes:

> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> If function_graph tracer is enabled during kexec, we see the below
>> exception in the simulator:
>>      root@(none):/# kexec -e
>>      kvm: exiting hardware virtualization
>>      kexec_core: Starting new kernel
>>      [   19.262020070,5] OPAL: Switch to big-endian OS
>>      kexec: Starting switchover sequence.
>>      Interrupt to 0xC000000000004380 from 0xC000000000004380
>>      ** Execution stopped: Continuous Interrupt, Instruction caused 
>> exception,  **
>>
>> Now that we have a more effective way to disable ftrace, let's use that
>> before switching to a new kernel during kexec.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 6 ++----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> index 2694d078741d..4a1b24a9dd61 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> @@ -95,16 +95,14 @@ void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void)
>>   */
>>  void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
>>  {
>> -    int save_ftrace_enabled;
>> -
>> -    save_ftrace_enabled = __ftrace_enabled_save();
>> +    get_paca()->ftrace_disabled = 1;
>
> This doesn't compile on 32-bit:
>
>   Failed: powerpc-next/corenet32_smp_defconfig/powerpc-5.3            
> (http://kisskb.ozlabs.ibm.com/kisskb/buildresult/13314085/log/)
>     /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c:105:12: error: invalid 
> type argument of '->' (have 'int')
>     /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c:98:12: error: invalid 
> type argument of '->' (have 'int')
>     /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c:98:2: error: implicit 
> declaration of function 'get_paca' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
>
> A wrapper is probably best that does nothing on 32-bit.

Actually it should probably do __ftrace_enabled_save() etc. on 32-bit,
like the existing code does.

cheers

Reply via email to