On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 15:46 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Cyril Bur <cyril...@gmail.com> writes: > > > tm_reclaim_thread() doesn't use the parameter anymore, both callers have > > to bother getting it as they have no need for a struct thread_info > > either. > > In future please tell me why the parameter is unused and when it became > unused. >
Thanks, will do! > In this case it was previously used but the last usage was removed in: > > dc3106690b20 ("powerpc: tm: Always use fp_state and vr_state to store live > registers") > > cheers > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > > index bfdd783e3916..a47498da6562 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > > @@ -853,8 +853,7 @@ static inline bool tm_enabled(struct task_struct *tsk) > > return tsk && tsk->thread.regs && (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_TM); > > } > > > > -static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, > > - struct thread_info *ti, uint8_t cause) > > +static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, uint8_t cause) > > { > > /* > > * Use the current MSR TM suspended bit to track if we have > > @@ -901,7 +900,7 @@ static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, > > void tm_reclaim_current(uint8_t cause) > > { > > tm_enable(); > > - tm_reclaim_thread(¤t->thread, current_thread_info(), cause); > > + tm_reclaim_thread(¤t->thread, cause); > > } > > > > static inline void tm_reclaim_task(struct task_struct *tsk) > > @@ -932,7 +931,7 @@ static inline void tm_reclaim_task(struct task_struct > > *tsk) > > thr->regs->ccr, thr->regs->msr, > > thr->regs->trap); > > > > - tm_reclaim_thread(thr, task_thread_info(tsk), TM_CAUSE_RESCHED); > > + tm_reclaim_thread(thr, TM_CAUSE_RESCHED); > > > > TM_DEBUG("--- tm_reclaim on pid %d complete\n", > > tsk->pid); > > -- > > 2.16.1