Currently, update_mmu_cache will crash if given a no-access PTE.  There's no
need to synchronize dcache/icache unless it's an exec mapping -- however,
due to the existence of older glibc versions that execute out of a
read-but-no-exec page, readability is tested instead.

This assumes no exec-only mappings; if such mappings become supported, they
will need to go through the kmap_atomic() version of dcache/icache
synchronization.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This fixes the following bug:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/051080.html

 arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
index e812244..c7d7bd4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
@@ -483,7 +483,12 @@ void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned 
long address,
                 */
                _tlbie(address, 0 /* 8xx doesn't care about PID */);
 #endif
-               if (!PageReserved(page)
+               /* The _PAGE_USER test should really be _PAGE_EXEC, but
+                * older glibc versions execute some code from no-exec
+                * pages, which for now we are supporting.  If exec-only
+                * pages are ever implemented, this will have to change.
+                */
+               if (!PageReserved(page) && (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_USER)
                    && !test_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags)) {
                        if (vma->vm_mm == current->active_mm) {
                                __flush_dcache_icache((void *) address);
-- 
1.5.3.8
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to