On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:52:14AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > >device_type property is bogus, thus use proper compatible. > > > >Also change compatible property to "fsl,ucc-mdio". > > > >Per http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html > > > >Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > can we look at using "fsl,gianfar-mdio" ? Meaning my understanding > the programming model for the UCC mdio is identical to gianfar MDIO > programming.
I didn't look much into gianfar mii driver, so I can't tell. Would "fsl,ucc-mdio", "fsl,gianfar-mdio" work for us? That way we'll match on "fsl,ucc-mdio" today, and "fsl,gianfar-mdio" when/if drivers are merged? -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev