On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:46:46PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Hmm, which p9 mambo is this? I get: > > test: cache_shape > tags: git_version:v4.10-10927-g0a55d1671c33 > L1I cache size: 0x8000 32768B 32K > L1I line size: 0x80 128-way associative > L1D cache size: 0x8000 32768B 32K > L1D line size: 0x80 128-way associative > L2 cache size: 0 0B 0K > L2 line size: 0 fully associative > L3 cache size: 0 0B 0K > L3 line size: 0 fully associative > success: cache_shape > > So that looks OK, other than that here is no L2/L3 info.
128 ways? Looks okay? Erm... Segher
