Paul Clarke <p...@us.ibm.com> writes: > P9 (with bad device-tree): > -- > # ./cache_shape > test: cache_shape > tags: git_version:v4.10-0-gc470abd-dirty > L1I cache size: 0 0B 0K > L1I line size: 0x80 fully associative > L1D cache size: 0 0B 0K > L1D line size: 0x80 fully associative > L2 cache size: 0 0B 0K > L2 line size: 0 fully associative > L3 cache size: 0 0B 0K > L3 line size: 0 fully associative > success: cache_shape > --
Hmm, which p9 mambo is this? I get: test: cache_shape tags: git_version:v4.10-10927-g0a55d1671c33 L1I cache size: 0x8000 32768B 32K L1I line size: 0x80 128-way associative L1D cache size: 0x8000 32768B 32K L1D line size: 0x80 128-way associative L2 cache size: 0 0B 0K L2 line size: 0 fully associative L3 cache size: 0 0B 0K L3 line size: 0 fully associative success: cache_shape So that looks OK, other than that here is no L2/L3 info. I'm using mambo commit e0c03c93c6d14c5f842840cc4ac4183cb25e123b. > > Do you want me to Ack your v3 patch set in that thread? No don't bother, it's already merged so your ack wouldn't get included in the git history. This mail thread is record enough that it got tested by someone other than me. Thanks for testing. cheers