On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:16:24PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> The l2-cache controller on the T2080 SoC has similar capabilities to the
> others already supported by the mpc85xx_edac driver. Add it to the list
> of compatible devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <j...@kernel.org>
> ---
> This is a resend of a patch that got an ack[1] but didn't seem to get
> picked up.
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=148042072225488&w=2
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Collect ack from Johannes.
Whoops, my bad. Sorry about that.
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi | 1 +
> drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi
> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi
> index c744569a20e1..a97296c64eb2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi
> @@ -678,5 +678,6 @@
> compatible = "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller";
> reg = <0xc20000 0x40000>;
> next-level-cache = <&cpc>;
> + interrupts = <16 2 1 9>;
> };
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> index 8f66cbed70b7..67f7bc3fe5b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> @@ -629,6 +629,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-l2-cache-controller", },
> { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-l2-cache-controller", },
> { .compatible = "fsl,p2020-l2-cache-controller", },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller", },
WARNING: DT compatible string "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller" appears
un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
#58: FILE: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:632:
+ { .compatible = "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller", },
What is checkpatch.pl trying to tell me here?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
