On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:17:26PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:22:46PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> >
> >> Basically the powerpc/boot directory files.
> >>
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> --- /dev/null 2005-11-20 22:22:37.000000000 -0500
> >> +++ arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-warp.c 2008-01-08 12:09:39.000000000
> >> -0500
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2008 PIKA Technologies
> >> + * Sean MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> >> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> >> published
> >> + * by the Free Software Foundation.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include "ops.h"
> >> +#include "44x.h"
> >> +#include "cuboot.h"
> >> +
> >> +#define TARGET_44x
> >> +#include "ppcboot.h"
> >> +
> >> +static bd_t bd;
> >> +
> >> +void platform_init(unsigned long r3, unsigned long r4, unsigned long r5,
> >> + unsigned long r6, unsigned long r7)
> >> +{
> >> + CUBOOT_INIT();
> >> +
> >> + warp_init(&bd.bi_enetaddr, &bd.bi_enet1addr);
> >> +}
> >> --- /dev/null 2005-11-20 22:22:37.000000000 -0500
> >> +++ arch/powerpc/boot/warp.c 2008-01-08 12:09:54.000000000 -0500
> >>
> >
> > Fold all this into cuboot-warp.c, unless you actually anticipate
> > adding another wrapper for another firmware which will also use the
> > functions in warp.c.
> >
> >
> Yes, there is still a plan to use the u-boot device tree. Although not
> in the near feature. I could roll them togeather for now and split them
> out later.
Yes, but device-tree aware u-boot doesn't need anything platform
specific in the bootwrapper, so won't be a second user of warp.c.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
