On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I have no opinions about the config symbol names. Among the existing
> precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the
> HAVE_ prefix than those using it.
The convention is newly established - so no suprise.
> The patch versions I've sent now work
> fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow
> the style of what's already in common use. At this point, I think it would
> be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches
> for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups.
Would love to - but the pile of other kbuild stuff only gets bigger..
Sam
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
