I have no opinions about the config symbol names. Among the existing precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the HAVE_ prefix than those using it. The patch versions I've sent now work fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow the style of what's already in common use. At this point, I think it would be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups.
Thanks, Roland _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
