On Thursday, June 30, 2016 05:46:42 AM Scott Wood wrote: > On 06/29/2016 10:02 PM, Yuantian Tang wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > >> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:24 AM > >> To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.t...@nxp.com> > >> Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net>; Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk>; > >> Michael Turquette <mturque...@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd > >> <sb...@codeaurora.org>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>; linux- > >> c...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- > >> d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren > >> <xiaofeng....@nxp.com>; Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible > >> parent clocks > >> > >> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 01:47:09 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > >>>> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM > >>>> To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.t...@nxp.com> > >>>> Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net>; Russell King > >>>> <li...@armlinux.org.uk>; Michael Turquette > >>>> <mturque...@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>; > >>>> Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>; linux- c...@vger.kernel.org; > >>>> linux...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo > >>>> Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren <xiaofeng....@nxp.com>; Scott > >>>> Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering > >>>> possible parent clocks > >>>> > >>>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 05:50:26 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> This patch is acked by clock maintainer. If no comments from > >>>>> anyone else, > >>>> we will merge it in next week. > >>>> > >>>> There is a cpufreq commit depending on it. Are you going to handle > >>>> that one too? > >>>> > >>> That one has been acked by cpufreq maintainer. You can get this from > >> patch comments. > >> > >> I know that it has been ACKed. > >> > >> My question is whether or not you are going to apply it along the [1/2]. > >> > >> If not, it will have to be deferred until the [1/2] is merged and then > >> applied > >> which may not be desirable. > >> > > I hope we can apply both at same time. Seems Scott has a few concerns. > > > > What you think about this patch? Can you apply it? > > If you have applied this patch, then I can push CPUfreq maintainer to apply > > another one which will be delayed. > > My only concern was getting an ack for this patch (1/2) -- did I miss it > somewhere?
OK, so who's going to apply the series? Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
