On 06/29/2016 10:02 PM, Yuantian Tang wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] >> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:24 AM >> To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.t...@nxp.com> >> Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net>; Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk>; >> Michael Turquette <mturque...@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd >> <sb...@codeaurora.org>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>; linux- >> c...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- >> d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren >> <xiaofeng....@nxp.com>; Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible >> parent clocks >> >> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 01:47:09 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] >>>> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM >>>> To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.t...@nxp.com> >>>> Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net>; Russell King >>>> <li...@armlinux.org.uk>; Michael Turquette >>>> <mturque...@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>; >>>> Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>; linux- c...@vger.kernel.org; >>>> linux...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo >>>> Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren <xiaofeng....@nxp.com>; Scott >>>> Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering >>>> possible parent clocks >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 05:50:26 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> This patch is acked by clock maintainer. If no comments from >>>>> anyone else, >>>> we will merge it in next week. >>>> >>>> There is a cpufreq commit depending on it. Are you going to handle >>>> that one too? >>>> >>> That one has been acked by cpufreq maintainer. You can get this from >> patch comments. >> >> I know that it has been ACKed. >> >> My question is whether or not you are going to apply it along the [1/2]. >> >> If not, it will have to be deferred until the [1/2] is merged and then >> applied >> which may not be desirable. >> > I hope we can apply both at same time. Seems Scott has a few concerns. > > What you think about this patch? Can you apply it? > If you have applied this patch, then I can push CPUfreq maintainer to apply > another one which will be delayed.
My only concern was getting an ack for this patch (1/2) -- did I miss it somewhere? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
