Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
On Jun 21, 2016, at 5:34 AM, Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi Ian,
Ian Munsie <imun...@au1.ibm.com> writes:
Excerpts from Vaibhav Jain's message of 2016-06-20 14:20:16 +0530:
What exactly is the use case for this API? I'd vote to drop it if we can
do without it.
Agree with this. Functionality of this API can be merged with
cxl_set_driver_ops when called with NULL arg for cxl_afu_driver_ops.
Passing a NULL arg instead of calling an 'unset' API is fine with us.
I'll add that for cxlflash, I can't envision a scenario where we'll unset the
driver ops for a context.
Agreed, thanks. I will drop API cxl_unset_driver_ops() in v7.
Philippe
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
