> On Jun 21, 2016, at 5:34 AM, Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > Ian Munsie <imun...@au1.ibm.com> writes: > >> Excerpts from Vaibhav Jain's message of 2016-06-20 14:20:16 +0530: >> >> What exactly is the use case for this API? I'd vote to drop it if we can >> do without it. > Agree with this. Functionality of this API can be merged with > cxl_set_driver_ops when called with NULL arg for cxl_afu_driver_ops.
Passing a NULL arg instead of calling an 'unset' API is fine with us. I'll add that for cxlflash, I can't envision a scenario where we'll unset the driver ops for a context. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev