On Wednesday 26 December 2007, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> Celleb-native needs own machine definition and setup code due to HW
> and FW deferences between CellBlade and Celleb. Of course, because
> Celleb-native and Celleb-Beat use some codes commonly, we need a place
> to put Celleb common codes.
>
> But I don't know your idea is better or not.
The two more sensible options I can see are
* leave everything where it is, live with the problem that the
separation between celleb-native, celleb-beat and ibm-native
is unclear.
* put both celleb and the ibm blades into the cell subdirectory,
now with three different machine descriptions in there and only
make sure that platforms/cell doesn't share any code with ps3,
which is more clearly separated already (once we move spufs out).
I'm fine either way, and will accept patches from Toshiba to merge
the two directories if you prefer that, but I won't do it myself.
Arnd <><
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
