On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:47:42PM +0900, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Hi all, > > > To the question, where what it should go, I'd leave the decision to > > Jeremy, but my current idea would be: > > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs -> arch/powerpc/spufs > > I'd suggest arch/powerpc/sysdev/spufs to keep arch/powerpc clean. > > However, this may also depend on the (intended) structure of SPURSEngine > support, which may mean that fs/spufs might be a better place. It would > suck to have to move things twice, so maybe someone from Tosihba could > provide some input? Would the powerpc spufs code be suitable for > SPURSEngine?
Strong NACK for fs/spufs/ fs code is the smallest part of the spu support, and all this nasty lowlevel code doesn't belong into fs/ at all. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
