On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 02:52 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007, at 2:47 AM, Li Tony wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I think it is possible to make common code to support both IPIC and > > MPIC. > > Currently, the MPIC has already implemented MSI which is different > > from IPIC and embedded into the mpic code body. > > If want to unifiy MSI code, we need to remove the current MPIC MSI > > implementation. > > The MPIC is going to have to support several MSI styles (IBM/U3, > PaSemi, and FSL) since we all seem to handle it differently.
I haven't really looked at the similarities or differences, but I think Kumar is right, MPIC is going to have to (and already does) support different styles. If there's some commonality that can be shared I'm all ears, patches welcome ;) cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
