On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 04:49:46PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Anton,
> 
> > +int gpio_direction_input(unsigned int gpio)
> > +{
> > +   unsigned long flags;
> > +   int port = gpio / 32;
> > +   int pin = gpio % 32;
> > +
> > +   spin_lock_irqsave(&cpm2_port_locks[port], flags);
> > +
> > +   cpm2_set_pin(port, pin, CPM_PIN_INPUT | CPM_PIN_GPIO);
> 
> > +int gpio_direction_output(unsigned int gpio, int value)
> > +{
> > +   struct cpm2_ioports __iomem *iop =
> > +           (struct cpm2_ioports __iomem *)&cpm2_immr->im_ioport;
> > +   int port = gpio / 32;
> > +   int pin = gpio % 32;
> > +   unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +   pin = 1 << (31 - pin);
> > +
> > +   spin_lock_irqsave(&cpm2_port_locks[port], flags);
> > +
> > +   cpm2_set_pin(port, pin, CPM_PIN_OUTPUT | CPM_PIN_GPIO);
> 
> You seem to do the pin -> bitmask conversation twice in 
> gpio_direction_output().
> 
> cpm2_set_pin() must be executed before pin = 1 << (31 - pin);

Yup, found this just after posting. ;-) I've tried to move as much as
possible out of spinlocked section, but done it obviously wrong.
Will fix.

Anyhow, much thanks for looking into this.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to