Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> A cell-index property would be useful here for indexing into the summary
>> status register.
>
> Divide by 0x80.
:-P
Using cell-index for things like this is reasonably common, and endorsed
by current ePAPR drafts.
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>>> compatible = "fsl,mpc8610-dma", "fsl,mpc8540-
>>>> dma";
>>>> --> device-id = <0>;
>>
>> I don't see any justification for having such a property in the parent
>> node,
>> though.
>
> huh?
Timur put device-id properties in both the parent and the channel nodes.
I was wondering why he did the former.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
