On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:14:40PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> + - compatible : compatible list, contains 2 entries, >> first is >> + "fsl,CHIP-dma", where CHIP is the processor >> + (mpc8540, mpc8540, etc.) and the second is >> + "fsl,eloplus-dma" > > So if the DMA register set gets tweaked again, will we have > eloplusplus? :-) > Maybe elo2 would be better.
Seem unlikely for the forseeable future. > Do we really need completely separate descriptions of the two, or > can we just describe the difference in the compatible section? it seemed easier to duplicate and fix. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
