On 10/24/07, Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Smirl wrote: > > > Why are you using a vendor named directory? I don't believe vendor > > named directories are used anywhere in the kernel. The directories are > > always named after the platform or architecture. Vendor directories > > end up in a big mess if Freescale decides to sell a CPU to someone > > else. > > Two reasons: > > 1) The sound/soc directory already has names like "at91" and "pxa", so I > thought > "fsl" is appropriate.
pxa is the processor family. Intel sold the pxa cpus to Marvell six months ago. > > 2) There may not be any directories named "fsl", but there are plenty of files > with that name: > > ./arch/powerpc/boot/fsl-soc.c > ./arch/powerpc/boot/fsl-soc.h > ./arch/powerpc/boot/fsl-soc.o > ./arch/powerpc/mm/fsl_booke_mmu.c > ./arch/powerpc/platforms/fsl_uli1575.c > ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c > ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.h > ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c > ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.h > ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o > ./arch/ppc/mm/fsl_booke_mmu.c > ./drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_usb2_udc.c > ./drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_usb2_udc.h > ./include/linux/fsl_devices.h > ./include/config/fsl > > Having said all that, if you really think sound/soc/powerpc is better than > sound/soc/fsl, I won't complain. > > -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
