Jon Smirl wrote: > Why are you using a vendor named directory? I don't believe vendor > named directories are used anywhere in the kernel. The directories are > always named after the platform or architecture. Vendor directories > end up in a big mess if Freescale decides to sell a CPU to someone > else.
Two reasons: 1) The sound/soc directory already has names like "at91" and "pxa", so I thought "fsl" is appropriate. 2) There may not be any directories named "fsl", but there are plenty of files with that name: ./arch/powerpc/boot/fsl-soc.c ./arch/powerpc/boot/fsl-soc.h ./arch/powerpc/boot/fsl-soc.o ./arch/powerpc/mm/fsl_booke_mmu.c ./arch/powerpc/platforms/fsl_uli1575.c ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.h ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.h ./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o ./arch/ppc/mm/fsl_booke_mmu.c ./drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_usb2_udc.c ./drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_usb2_udc.h ./include/linux/fsl_devices.h ./include/config/fsl Having said all that, if you really think sound/soc/powerpc is better than sound/soc/fsl, I won't complain. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
