On Thursday 18 October 2007 17:25, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Understood. The situation here is that the boards, which required these > > modifications, have no support in the arch/powerpc branch. So this is > > why we made this in arch/ppc. > > Bit of a dilemma then. What board exactly?
These are the Katmai and Yucca PPC440SPe-based boards (from AMCC). > > > Also, I'd rather see something along the lines of hugetlbfs support > > > instead. > > > > Here I agree with Benjamin. Furthermore, IIRC the hugetlb file-system is > > supported for PPC64 architectures only. Here we have PPC32. > > Well that needs fixing anyway, but ok. Also, is the modified binutils > only required for userspace to take advantage here? Seems so, but I'd > just like to be sure. You are right, for userspace only. > > josh > -- Yuri Tikhonov, Senior Software Engineer Emcraft Systems, www.emcraft.com _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
