On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:02 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > k, trying again, leaving the actual patch below. In the above patch > description, you still call it __napi_synchronize. In the patch > below, > it's napi_syncronize. > > I was just trying to point out to whomever commits this patch that the > actual description should probably be fixed.
Yup, I noticed finally :-) I think whoever commits can fix it up (it's likely that it's sch patch that gets commited anyway). Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
