Eugene Surovegin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:53:40PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >> Though, I don't see what the problem with the original approach is, >> as long as the numbers are chosen in the same way when registering >> i2c clients based on the children of the adapter node. There's no >> concept in the hardware itself of a bus number. > > Huh? As far as I can tell, there is.
Where? Hardware != Documentation. > Also, I want messages from the kernel mention something I can map to > the real hw, e.g. fixed IIC device index, not some random number. The OF node path should have a unit address that accomplishes that. > I find it rather puzzling that instead people are trying to make this > a non-issue as soon as it cannot be implemented easily with their new > and shiny infrastructure. "People" are not a monolithic entity. I never advocated using bus numbers. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
