On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:53:40PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Though, I don't see what the problem with the original approach is, as long > as the numbers are chosen in the same way when registering i2c clients based > on the children of the adapter node. There's no concept in the hardware > itself of a bus number.
Huh? As far as I can tell, there is. Also, I want messages from the kernel mention something I can map to the real hw, e.g. fixed IIC device index, not some random number. This already works with the current OCP code, so if you want change it to a "superior" technology, please, make sure it provides the same functionality as trivial OCP one. I find it rather puzzling that instead people are trying to make this a non-issue as soon as it cannot be implemented easily with their new and shiny infrastructure. -- Eugene _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
