On Oct 9, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > >> But that's a function of linux' use. Remember decouple the device >> tree from how linux does things. > > Ok, I just understand what your point is. I'm proposing that we > just put the name of the clock source in the device tree, and have > a function which converts that into an internal representation. > The clock is called "BRG3". It's not called BRG, #3 or something > like that. Same thing with the CLK sources.
Ok. I guess I'm not in favor of changing the device tree to address this issue. I think it would be solved if "dtc" had #define support. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
