On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:56:46PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Anton Vorontsov wrote: >> >>> Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix >>> PCI/PCIe nodes, but actually it broke them even harder. ;-) >> >> Of course. But shouldn't those be the subnoses of the "soc" >> type node? > > Nope. PCI's ranges = <>; isn't in the SOC address space. > > Valentine Barshak posted a patch titled "[RFC] [PATCH] PowerPC: Add > 64-bit > phys addr support to 32-bit pci" that started using > of_translate_address() > for ranges, and of_translate_address() will not work if PCI placed > in the > SOC node. Not sure if that patch applied or not, though.
I'm confused, what's the actual issue with PCI that this patch addresses? - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
