On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:56:46PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix >> PCI/PCIe nodes, but actually it broke them even harder. ;-) > > Of course. But shouldn't those be the subnoses of the "soc" type node?
Nope. PCI's ranges = <>; isn't in the SOC address space. Valentine Barshak posted a patch titled "[RFC] [PATCH] PowerPC: Add 64-bit phys addr support to 32-bit pci" that started using of_translate_address() for ranges, and of_translate_address() will not work if PCI placed in the SOC node. Not sure if that patch applied or not, though. Good luck, -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
