>> Those don't agree. It's probably best to describe the whole >> DMA controller register block in this node. Why do you need >> subnodes for the channels at all? > > The channels have separate registers and sometimes separate interrupts > -- > it's simpler to bind to a channel at a time than to parse a list of reg > blocks and interrupts. It's also more flexible in case a new chip > comes > out with more/fewer channels, or if certain channels are not general > purpose.
I don't see this as more flexible, but no problem, it will work for sure. The "reg" vs. textual unit address issue needs to be solved though. Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
