> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 04:43:35PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > + l) Freescale DMA > > > > > + - compatible : Should be "fsl,dma". > > > > Please choose some more specific name. "fsl,mpc8540-dma" would > > be a reasonable choice perhaps. > > More precisely, the compatible property should always have an specific > entry based on the exact chip the DMA engine resides in, as well as a > more general entry for any fsl dma engine of this type. > There is only difference in DMA channel and not in DMA node now. Does it need add the precise compatible property name?
Thanks! - zw _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
