On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 04:57:08PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:13:13PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > As suggested by David Gibson, now that we have a separate node > > for the baud rate generators, it's better to use the standard > > clock-frequency property than a cpm-node-level fsl,brg-frequency > > property. > > > > This patch updates existing places where fsl,brg-frequency is > > used. > > What about older platforms that were booted with the older device > tree? Don't you have to stay compatible with them?
The older platforms use /soc/cpm/brg-frequency, not /soc/cpm/fsl,brg-frequency -- and that is still supported. The latter only exists as one patch in Kumar's tree. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
