On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:13:13PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > As suggested by David Gibson, now that we have a separate node > for the baud rate generators, it's better to use the standard > clock-frequency property than a cpm-node-level fsl,brg-frequency > property. > > This patch updates existing places where fsl,brg-frequency is > used.
What about older platforms that were booted with the older device tree? Don't you have to stay compatible with them? Think kexec of a system running a kernel with the older device tree, for example. -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
