On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:44:31 -0500 Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500 > > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back > >>into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files? > > > > > > What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the > > opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during > > arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to > > port. > > The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one doesn't > need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change to arch/powerpc. Who worries about that? ;). Ok, I can see that. Still seems wasteful to me though. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
