On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:44:31AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500
> > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back
> >>into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files?
> >
> >
> > What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the
> > opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
> > arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to
> > port.
>
> The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one
> doesn't need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change
> to arch/powerpc.
Exactly so. Having to be careful about not breaking arch/ppc when
doing cleanups for arch/powerpc is a pain in the bum.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
