Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> Actually I see no good reason to enforce no-exec at all if we can't do >> it consistently. And if we're not going to enforce it then there is >> no point whinging about it. > > > I have a new patch with just this behaviour, Scott is > testing it on old glibc (I think it succeeded, need > confirmation though),
It worked fine on glibc 2.2.5 and 2.3.3 (the former of which failed without the patch). -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
