On Jul 11, 2007, at 10:32 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> Actually I see no good reason to enforce no-exec at all if we >>> can't do >>> it consistently. And if we're not going to enforce it then there is >>> no point whinging about it. >> >> >> I have a new patch with just this behaviour, Scott is >> testing it on old glibc (I think it succeeded, need >> confirmation though), > > It worked fine on glibc 2.2.5 and 2.3.3 (the former of which failed > without the patch).
It sounds like this is a candidate for stable 2.6.22.x as well once you release the patch. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
