On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:25:22AM +0200, dave penkler wrote: > > For supportability I would recommend to set the commands depending on the > > recognised HW, not with aA ioctl. See rigol quirk. What are the device > > and manufacturer ids to which these vendor extensions apply? > > /dave > > This is a custom device... If I understand USBTMC spec corectly, it is not > either "normal" message or vendor specific message, but both can happily > coexist, so I wouldn't let it depend on quirks. Once you are going to send > vendor specific message, you need to know how such a message looks like > anyway, so any quirk based magic is probably not going to help. > Also it seems both NI and IVI libs are using similar (selecting MsgID) > approach.
But your patch was "one-way", once you switched to the other mode, the old one could not be used :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
