On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 16.01.2015 o 13:12, Dan Carpenter pisze:
> >Oh, yeah.  You're right.  I should have been more careful and I should
> >have seen that.  Sorry.  But the problem is the original code is still a
> >bit buggy.
> >
> >We call:
> >
> >     data = kzalloc();
> >
> >Inside __uvcg_fill_strm() we do "data += something;"
> >
> >     kfree(data);
> >
> >We should save the orignal data pointer so that we can free it
> >correctly at the end in uvcg_streaming_class_allow_link().
> >
> Yeah, right. Thank you for spotting this. The kfree() is called
> only if __uvcg_fill_strm() fails, though. But of course this needs
> to be fixed.

so, should I wait for another version of $subject ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to