On 29/05/14 19:55, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Jim Baxter <jim_bax...@mentor.com> writes: > >> The NDP was ignoring the wNextNdpIndex in the NDP which >> means that NTBs containing multiple NDPs would have missed >> frames. > > Well, just for the record: I believe this field was meant to be reserved > and always 0 in the CDC NCM spec. Table 3-3, describing 16bit NDPs, > says so. But reading the spec now, I noticed that there is an > inconsistency between table 3-3 and table 3-4 describing 32bit NDPs. It > looks like the field is not reserved in the 32bit version. > > I am pretty sure that is a specification error, but I guess it doesn't > harm to implement the support anyway. And it paves the way for an MBIM > gadget :-) > > > > > Bjørn >
Yes I was looking at Figure 3-1, Figure 3-2 which all state it is a link. I must have been reading Table 3-4. I am glad to see it helps with the MBIM specification :-) . Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
