Jim Baxter <jim_bax...@mentor.com> writes: > The NDP was ignoring the wNextNdpIndex in the NDP which > means that NTBs containing multiple NDPs would have missed > frames.
Well, just for the record: I believe this field was meant to be reserved and always 0 in the CDC NCM spec. Table 3-3, describing 16bit NDPs, says so. But reading the spec now, I noticed that there is an inconsistency between table 3-3 and table 3-4 describing 32bit NDPs. It looks like the field is not reserved in the 32bit version. I am pretty sure that is a specification error, but I guess it doesn't harm to implement the support anyway. And it paves the way for an MBIM gadget :-) Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
