Hello.

On 05/31/2013 10:38 PM, Michael Grzeschik wrote:

From: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
---
  drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c 
b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
index 4d64541..48c446b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
[...]
@@ -140,19 +139,21 @@ static int ci13xxx_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[...]
+       phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "fsl,usbphy", 0);
+

    Empty line is not really needed here, don't you think?

+       if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {

   Hm, can PTR_ERR() be called on non-error pointers? Seems so...

+               ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+               goto err_clk;
+       }
+
+       if (!IS_ERR(phy)) {
+               ret = usb_phy_init(phy);
+               if (ret) {
+                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to init phy: %d\n", ret);
+                       goto err_clk;
                }
+
+               data->phy = phy;
        }

Shouldn't this come first instead, with the above PTR_ERR() condition in
the *else* branch?

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to