On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 01:39 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Fortunately none of the init calls between calibrate_delay() and > arch_cpu_finalize_init() is relevant for the functionality of > arch_cpu_finalize_init(). >
Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgeco...@intel.com> I did my best to find a counterpoint to this statement. The only thing I found was that lockdep_init_task(&init_task) in fork_init() is now called after the spin_lock() usage in set_memory_4k(). But AFAICT, that whole lockdep_init_task() call is unneeded because the fields it sets are already statically initialized. I mention only because I'm not 100% sure the lockdep_init_task() call is not serving some purpose I'm missing. _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
